 |
|
| View previous
topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MParedon Junior Member

Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 21 Location:
Corpus Christi, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003
11:19 am Post
subject: 'Whore of Babylon' |
|
|
I was in Barnes & Noble
the other day and I saw quite a few books depicting Iraq
and/or other parts of the Middle East as the Whore of Babylon.
I was wondering if maybe those places are replacing the RCC as
the W of B in peoples minds.
I have to admit I don't
know much about the 'Whore of Babylon', I only know that I've
heard the RCC being labled as such.
I was also
wondering if this new W of B is distinctly American in
viewpoint. I don't know if I can articulate very well why I
think this, but I am troubled by it. It sometimes seems
that many people associate being Christian with being
American, and while I am loyal to the U.S.A., I never really
thought of God taking the American viewpoint b/c He has his
own viewpoint that is bigger than one country. His people
belong to all countries.
Oops, I didn't mean to get on
a soapbox. But I come from the Deep South and I am confronted
with these things and right now I was just hoping for other
peoples thoughts and opinions. _________________ Maria
G.
"Preach the gospel at all times. Use words when
necessary." -Saint Francis of Assisi | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Clare of
Assisi Advanced Member

Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 253
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003
11:24 am Post
subject: Re: 'Whore of Babylon' |
|
|
| MParedon
wrote: |
| It sometimes seems that many people
associate being Christian with being American
|
I'm in
Minnesota and I don't see that at
all. _________________ Luz Paolina Perleberg
Every child comes with the message that God is not yet
discouraged of man. ~Rabindranath Tagore | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Laura Veteran Member

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 Posts: 1386 Location:
right here, of course!
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003
5:55 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Maria, I'm from the
South, too, and I know exactly what you mean!
Unfortunately, I haven't figured out what to do about
it, yet!
One bit of good news that I heard yesterday: our local
homeschoolers' group is very ecumenical -- lots of families
from the two Catholic parishes, but also some anti-Catholic
fundamentalist families. They have gotten together, their kids
are in a choir... and that choir is coming to our 9:30 mass on
Gaudete Sunday to sing!
That means that a number of
fundamentalist families will be attending Mass that day, with
their children who are singing with us and for us. Pray for us
all! _________________ Soli Deo Gloria
Laura | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
empther Advanced Member

Joined: 24 Oct 2002 Posts: 321 Location:
Biddeford, Maine, -Where life is as it should be- if you're
broke.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003
9:43 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
By the time John wrote
Revelations he had seen the persecutions of the Christians by
Nero and later emperors. Babylon is Rome, the pagan empire.
John couldn't use the name Rome explicitly in his
criticisms because it would have brought down more
persecution, but everybody knew what he meant.
Revelations is difficult reading because it's hard to
tell whether the stories in it refer to future events or to
incidents that happened in John's time. For example: it is
said the dragon or devil will be let loose for a thousand
years to ravage the world. Protestant writers have a whole
industry of book-writing about the "Millenium". I suspect the
dragon's 1,000 year freedom is simply the devil's influence in
the world throughout human history. The devil's "one thousand
years" will end at the end of the world when human history on
earth stops. Why would God at some future time give the devil
more power that he now has? _________________ Norman
Boutin
"I would rather die
than not be in the love of God" "God and the Church are one and we
should not complicate matters" "I know not if I will have
greater sufferings, but I trust in God"
---Saint Joan of
Arc | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Jammeraj Advanced Member
Joined: 13 Nov
2003 Posts: 109 Location: Nashville, TN
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003
10:47 pm Post
subject: |
|
|
Norman wrote:
| Quote: |
By the time John wrote Revelations he
had seen the persecutions of the Christians by Nero and
later emperors. Babylon is Rome, the pagan empire.
John couldn't use the name Rome explicitly in
his criticisms because it would have brought down more
persecution, but everybody knew what he
meant |
Interesting. I had never heard that
before. Would you be so kind as to post some links that back
that up? It makes perfect sense, but I like to see "proofs"
before I go and requote something I merely read on a chat
forum
Peace Art _________________ As for me and my house, we will follow
Rome... | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
morashb Intermediate Member
Joined: 20 Jul
2002 Posts: 70 Location: Camp Lejeune, NC
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003
11:39 pm Post
subject: |
|
|
Art,
For an in
depth discussion of the Apocalypse and the Whore of Babylon
you might want to read the following book:
"Rapture,
The End-Times Error that Leaves the Bible Behind" by David
Currie.
You can obtain it via Sophia Press:
1-800-888-9344 http://www.sophiainstitute.com/ _________________ Bob
M | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
empther Advanced Member

Joined: 24 Oct 2002 Posts: 321 Location:
Biddeford, Maine, -Where life is as it should be- if you're
broke.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003
11:51 pm Post
subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Interesting. I had never heard that
before. Would you be so kind as to post some links that
back that up? It makes perfect sense, but I like to see
"proofs" before I go and requote something I merely read
on a chat forum |
It is a sign of our
information-overload times that even something that "makes
perfect sense" needs "proofs".
What can be
proved? _________________ Norman Boutin
"I would rather die than not be in the
love of God" "God and the
Church are one and we should not complicate matters"
"I know not if I
will have greater sufferings, but I trust in
God" ---Saint Joan
of Arc | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Jammeraj Advanced Member
Joined: 13 Nov
2003 Posts: 109 Location: Nashville, TN
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003
12:04 am Post
subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
It is a sign of our information-overload
times that even something that "makes perfect sense"
needs "proofs".
What can be
proved? |
The claim that Rome is the Whore of
Babylon? Anyone can say that that is what the expression
refers to, but where is the proof or the reference that would
indicate thusly?
That is the problem with the Book of
Revelations...everyone has a "meaning" or interpretation for a
particular phrase, but no one has any proofs! Hmmmm...how are
we to know which is right and which is merely someones
interpretation?
And before I go around quoting
something as "truth", I like to know that I can back it up
with facts. That is why I stated earlier that I had not heard
that Rome was considered the Whore of Babylon before your
post...and, inquiring minds like mine want to know.
Peace ~Art _________________ As for me and my house, we will follow
Rome... | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
gabriel Veteran Member

Joined: 16 Jul 2002 Posts: 3639 Location:
Southern California
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003
2:09 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Norman - Re John couldn't use the name Rome explicitly
in his criticisms because it would have brought down more
persecution, but everybody knew what he meant. It has
always been hard for me to believe that the dumbest Roman
couldn't recognize that the Seven Mountains referred to Rome.
I don’t see that it was a particularly Christian
reference. _________________ - Joe Kelley "Oh, that
today you would hear his voice, Harden not your hearts as at
the rebellion in the day of testing in the desert, where your
ancestors tested and tried me" | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Jammeraj Advanced Member
Joined: 13 Nov
2003 Posts: 109 Location: Nashville, TN
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003
2:22 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Bob
| Quote: |
For an in depth discussion of the
Apocalypse and the Whore of Babylon you might want to
read the following book:
"Rapture, The End-Times
Error that Leaves the Bible Behind" by David Currie.
You can obtain it via Sophia Press:
1-800-888-9344 http://www.sophiainstitute.com/ |
Thanks bro....Semper Fi!
Peace,
~Art _________________ As
for me and my house, we will follow Rome... | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
morashb Intermediate Member
Joined: 20 Jul
2002 Posts: 70 Location: Camp Lejeune, NC
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003
5:26 am Post subject:
|
|
|
"... the Seven Mountains
referred to Rome."
Here is something that is often
overlooked. - Jerusalem was also built upon 7 hills: Zion,
Acra, Moriah, Bezetha, Millo, Ophel, Antonio.
Could
the "harlot" mentioned be actually referring to
Jerusalem? _________________ Bob M | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
empther Advanced Member

Joined: 24 Oct 2002 Posts: 321 Location:
Biddeford, Maine, -Where life is as it should be- if you're
broke.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003
11:16 am Post
subject: |
|
|
The Catholic Encyclopedia
gives an interpretation of the Book of Revelations:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01594b.htm
Time and time again the Encyclopedia article
identifies events in the Roman Empire of John’s time as being
the symbols in the book.
Excerpts:
( First
of all, what is John trying to do by writing this book? )
"PURPOSE OF THE BOOK From this cursory perusal of
the book, it is evident that the Seer was influenced by the
prophecies of Daniel more than by any other book. Daniel was
written with the object of comforting the Jews under the cruel
persecution of Antiochus Epiphanes. The Seer in the Apocalypse
had a similar purpose. TheChristians were fiercely persecuted
in the reign of Domitian. The danger of apostasy was great.
False prophets went about, trying to seduce the people to
conform to the heathen practices and to take part in the
Caesar-worship. The Seer urges his Christians to remain true
to their faith and to bear their troubles with fortitude. He
encourages them with the promise of an ample and speedy
reward. He assures them that Christ s triumphant coming is at
hand.”
From the INTERPRETATION section:
“The
beast from the sea that had received plenitude of power from
the dragon, or Satan, is the Roman Empire, or rather, Caesar,
its supreme representative. The token of the beast with which
its servants are marked is the image of the emperor on the
coins of the realm. This seems to be the obvious meaning of
the passage, that all business transactions, all buying and
selling were impossible to them that had not the mark of the
beast (Ap., xiii. 17). “
..........and.............
“The seven heads of the beast are seven emperors. Five
of them the Seer says are fallen. They areAugustus
Tiberius,Caligula, Claudius, and Nero. The year of Nero's
death is A.D. 68. The Seer goes on to say "One is", namely
Vespasian, A.D. 70-79. He is the sixth emperor. The seventh,
we are told by the Seer, "is not yet come. But when he comes
his reign will be short". Titus is meant, who reigned but two
years (79-81). The eighth emperor is Domitian
(81-96).” _________________ Norman Boutin
"I would rather die than not be in the
love of God" "God and the
Church are one and we should not complicate matters"
"I know not if I
will have greater sufferings, but I trust in
God" ---Saint Joan
of Arc | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
blainethepaine Advanced Member

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 243 Location:
Carrollton, TX
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003
12:22 am Post
subject: |
|
|
Hi Bob,
| Quote: |
"... the Seven Mountains referred to
Rome."
Here is something that is often
overlooked. - Jerusalem was also built upon 7 hills:
Zion, Acra, Moriah, Bezetha, Millo, Ophel, Antonio.
|
and,
| Quote: |
Could the "harlot" mentioned be
actually referring to Jerusalem?
|
While I am tempted to lean towards the
interpretation of it being pagan Rome, I think this is
interesting, especially in light of this passage:
"
And their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city
which mystically is called Sodom and Egypt, where also their
Lord was crucified." (Rev. 11:8)
Its not really clear
if this is referring to the same city, but the fact that it is
called "great" is telling. We all know Christ was not
crucified in Rome, so the Jerusalem hypothesis has some
backing.
Art,
Catholic answers has some good
articles on this very subject. Here is one:
http://www.catholic.com/library/Hunting_the_Whore_of_Babylon.asp. _________________ Pax
Christi,
jack
"Because of his baldness and
hairiness he announced that it was a capital offense for
anyone either to look down on him as he passed or to mention
goats in any context." -Suetonius, The Life of
Gaius | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Jammeraj Advanced Member
Joined: 13 Nov
2003 Posts: 109 Location: Nashville, TN
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003
1:51 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Jack
Thanks for the
link. Interesting. I also find your hypothesis that Jerusalem
could be the Whore of Babylon.
Given the article you
linked me too...and given your Jerusalem hypothesis, I would
tend to agree with you that Jerusalem has some backing...it
would make more sense, in my way of thinking, anyway...as that
is where Christ was crucified.
Peace
~Art _________________ As
for me and my house, we will follow Rome... | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
angel1 New Member
Joined: 05 Oct
2003 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003
2:05 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| Jammeraj
wrote: |
Jack
Thanks for the link.
Interesting. I also find your hypothesis that Jerusalem
could be the Whore of Babylon.
Given the article
you linked me too...and given your Jerusalem hypothesis,
I would tend to agree with you that Jerusalem has some
backing...it would make more sense, in my way of
thinking, anyway...as that is where Christ was
crucified.
Peace
~Art |
Babylon is Iraq, (ancient) The Garden
Of Eden is in Iraq, The Babel Towers, Euphrates River, and
Tigris River, which is mentioned in Revelation is in
Iraq...Revelation 16 : 12, it all began in Iraq, and I believe
will end in Iraq...
Angel | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Eugene
Shubert Junior Member

Joined: 19 Nov 2003 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003
12:25 am Post
subject: The "Jerusalem" interpretation |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Their bodies will lie in the street of
the great city, which is figuratively called Sodom and
Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified. Revelation
11:8. NIV. | I
also see this verse as confirming the "Jerusalem"
interpretation. Isn't the hint obvious? The prophet Isaiah,
speaking to the people of his own day, said:
"Hear the
word of the LORD, You rulers of Sodom; Give ear to the
instruction of our God, You people of Gomorrah."
Isaiah 1:10.
Likewise, Ezekiel speaks of his own
people figuratively as being in Egypt (Ezk. 23:3,8,19,27).
Another clue is that Babylon is represented as a
harlot (Revelation 17). The parallel is that Ezekiel made
frequent use of this figure as a symbol of God's apostate
people (Ezk. 16).
However, I think that the strongest
argument for Jerusalem interpretation is Revelation 18:24. In
speaking of Babylon, the angel says:
"In her was found
the blood of prophets and of the saints, and of all who have
been killed on the earth" (Revelation 18:24).
This is
unmistakably similar to Matthew 23:32-36:
"Fill up, then, the measure of the
sin of your forefathers! You snakes! You brood of
vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell? Therefore
I am sending you prophets and wise men and teachers. Some of
them you will kill and crucify; others you will flog in your
synagogues and pursue from town to town. And so upon you will come all the
righteous blood that has been shed on earth, from the
blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of
Berekiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar.
I tell you the truth, all this will come upon this
generation." Matthew 23:32-36.
The problem, of course,
is that the world didn't end in the first century, as
predicted (Matthew 24:34). This is viewed as an overpowering
mystery to students of Biblical eschatology. Perhaps the
Church has failed to spread the gospel as Christ intended it
should? How do you know that Christ hasn't announced a delay
to the end of the world by presenting to us a prophecy in
Revelation of a great apostasy in the Christian Church? If you
don't think it's possible that God views all of Christendom as
a great apostasy, then what justification can there be to
think that all the accumulated guilt of world (up to the end
time) still falls upon Judaism? _________________ Then
Jesus said to his disciples, “If anyone would come after me,
he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.”
Matthew 16:24. | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
drawman Advanced Member

Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 308 Location:
Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003
2:12 am Post subject:
|
|
|
It seems to me that
Revelations is full of symbols that defy exact interpetations.
| Quote: |
"The great
city"' whose name is not given, seems to be Jerusalem,
which in Isaiah 1:10 is called Sodom because it has
turned its back on God. However, when the writer tells
us that it is "allegorically called Sodom and Egypt,
where their Lord was crucified" (v. 8), we may take
Jerusalem here to stand for any city or even any nation
where perversity holds sway (cf. Wis 19:14-17, which
alludes to Sodom and Egypt) and where Christians are
persecuted and hunted down (cf. Acts 9:5). Thus, St.
Jerome (Epist. 17) interpeted the names of Sodom and
Egypt as having a mystical or figurative meaning,
referring to the entire world seen as the city of the
devil and of evildoers. Further on, St John will
identify the Rome of his time with this "great city"
(cf. 17:9). | The Navarre Bible
Revelation
I will look up the Matthew verse and
get back to you. _________________ Peace, Steve
M. | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
drawman Advanced Member

Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 308 Location:
Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003
2:42 am Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| The problem,
of course, is that the world didn't end in the first
century, as predicted (Matthew 24:34).
|
In
Matthew 24:34 Jesus speaking of, the destruction of Jerusalem,
the end of the world and His last coming, says:
| Quote: |
| “Truly, I say
to you, this generation will not pass away till all
these things take place” |
| Quote: |
| “This
generation”… (Is) about the destruction of Jerusalem
being itself a symbol. “This generation” refers firstly
to the people alive at the time of the destruction of
Jerusalem. But, since that event is symbolic of the end
of the world, we can say with St John Chrysostom that
“the Lord was speaking not only of the generation then
living, but also of the generation of the believers; for
he knows that a generation is distinguished not only by
time but by its mode of religious worship and practice:
this is what the Psalmist means when he says that ‘such
is the generation of those who seek him’ (Ps 24:6)”
(Hom. On St Matthew,
77). | The Navarre Bible St
Matthew _________________ Peace, Steve
M. | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Fido85 Junior Member
Joined: 05 Dec
2003 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003
2:44 am Post subject:
|
|
|
An interesting note is that
in it's early days the symbol of the European Parliment was a
woman riding a beast on 7 hills.
I have heard many theories that the current
EU could be a revived Roman Empire in revelation. I have
actually never heard the theory on Jerusalem, don't really
know what to think about it. _________________ Paul
Steele
Delight youself in the Lord and he wil give you
the desires of your heart. Psalm 37:4 | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Eugene
Shubert Junior Member

Joined: 19 Nov 2003 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003
6:52 am Post subject:
|
|
|
drawman,
I agree
that the destruction of Jerusalem is a symbol. But if it's a
symbol that makes any sense at all, shouldn't it represent
apostate Christians who blindly follow the established church
(like the Jews did) and thus are not truly in step with
following Jesus Christ? If so, doesn't that lead us to the
conclusion that Babylon is apostate Christianity?
How
do you characterize the mind-set of the people of Jerusalem in
70AD just before their
destruction? _________________ Then Jesus said to his
disciples, “If anyone would come after me, he must deny
himself and take up his cross and follow me.” Matthew
16:24. | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
drawman Advanced Member

Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 308 Location:
Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003
9:57 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Eugene,
Do you have
a particular group of apostate Christians in mind? History is
not my strong point, so what was the mindset of the people of
Jerusalem at that time?
Actually, I get Rome and
Jerusalem mixed up, weren't they both part of the Roman
Empire? _________________ Peace, Steve
M. | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
morashb Intermediate Member
Joined: 20 Jul
2002 Posts: 70 Location: Camp Lejeune, NC
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003
10:12 am Post
subject: |
|
|
Eugene,
You stated,
"... But if it's a symbol that makes any sense at all,
shouldn't it represent apostate Christians who blindly follow
the established church (like the Jews did) and thus are not
truly in step with following Jesus Christ? If so, doesn't that
lead us to the conclusion that Babylon is apostate
Christianity?"
--------
I don't think so.
Keep in mind that "Christ established the Church" and
promised that the gates of hades would not prevail against it.
To follow the Church is not what will get us into trouble.
Those who were recipients of the destruction and rath
were not those who "were blindly" following, but actually
against those who were persecuting.
The following is
suggested by author David Currie in his book, "Rapture, The
End-Times Error That Leaves the Bible Behind," page 321 - 323:
The historian Josephus states the "royal city
Jerusalem was supreme, and presided over all neighboring
countries as the head does over the body." Jerusalem at the
time was on a trade route and was relatively wealthy: "The
woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and bedecked with
gold and jewels and pearls" (17:4).
"The sea-beast on
which the harlot has been riding will change its mind about
this evil woman and ultimately 'will hate the harlot ... will
make her desolate and naked, and devour her flesh and burn her
up with fire'" (17:16). ... There could be no clearer
fulfillment of these verses than in the events of the decade
leading up to 70 A.D. Jerusalem's Sanhedrin had sought to
repress the Christians from the very first beating they
administered to Peter and John (Acts 4). Three decades later,
in 64 A.D, they finally convinced the Roman authorities to
help them in their pursuit and persecution of the Christians.
The harlot Jerusalem then rode the beast Rome into the
Church's Great Tribulation. But in 66 A.D., Jerusalem
revolted. The Roman Empire turned on the city of the seven
hills in rage at this treachery and utterly destroyed
Jerusalem and its Temple. The beast Rome did indeed 'hate the
harlot ... make her desolate ... and burn her up with
fire.'" _________________ Bob M | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Eugene
Shubert Junior Member

Joined: 19 Nov 2003 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003
4:18 am Post subject:
The book of Revelation defines apostate Christianity |
|
|
drawman,
There is
only one basic kind of apostate Christian. Scripture,
including the book of Revelation, illustrates it clearly.
A major parallel between apostate Judaism in 70AD and
spiritual Babylon today, I believe, is their irrational
presumption of being secure in God's favor and at the same
time being completely indifferent to God's stated
requirements. For example: Imagine the reaction of the average
religious Jew in Jerusalem if he had heard that his church
leaders were involved in a malicious and unscriptural plot to
have Jesus crucified. I bet many were quiet. God's word says,
| Quote: |
| Nevertheless many even of the
authorities believed in him; but for fear of the
Pharisees they did not confess it, lest they should be
put out of the synagogue: for they loved the praise of
men more than the praise of God. John 12:42,
43. | The
temptation to follow the crowd on an easy path instead of
Christ (who asked us to walk in the straight and narrow way)
is a common temptation. I see temptations like this as having
universal applicability.
We are not to suppose that
the book of Revelation has lost its relevance. Evil still
exists. The whole world is being guided toward apostasy. Revelation
14:6-12 is a present-day warning against it. This
warning from God is important because eternal destiny is
determined by how these messages are received. It defines
apostasy. Those who fall for Satan's temptations will be lost.
Those who resist by the power of God will be
saved. _________________ Then Jesus said to his
disciples, “If anyone would come after me, he must deny
himself and take up his cross and follow me.” Matthew
16:24. | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Bill Hatfield
ObOSB Section Moderator

Joined: 12 Jul 2002 Posts: 3638 Location: The
Great State of Texas
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003
4:24 am Post subject:
Re: The book of Revelation defines apostate
Christianity |
|
|
| Eugene Shubert
wrote: |
The temptation to follow the crowd
on an easy path instead of Christ (who asked us to walk
in the straight and narrow way) is a common temptation.
I see temptations like this as having universal
applicability.
|
That is why this forum is full of good
Catholics, they down want to follow the crowd on the easy
path. _________________ Lt. Cmdr. Bill, "I have been driven many times to
my knees by the overwhelming conviction that I had nowhere
else to go." ~ Abraham Lincoln
 | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
drawman Advanced Member

Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 308 Location:
Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003
8:21 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Eugene,
The book of
Revelation is definitly a call to conversion. Wherever the
whore of Babylon is, there will be fire and
brimstone. _________________ Peace, Steve
M. | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
eightfoot514 Junior Member
Joined: 20 Aug
2003 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003
9:08 am Post subject:
|
|
|
| Eugene Shubert
wrote: |
| I agree that the destruction of
Jerusalem is a symbol. But if it's a symbol that makes
any sense at all, shouldn't it represent apostate
Christians who blindly follow the established church
(like the Jews did) and thus are not truly in step with
following Jesus Christ? If so, doesn't that lead us to
the conclusion that Babylon is apostate
Christianity? | This presents quite a conundrum. The
established Church is visible throughout the New Testament.
| Quote: |
| Acts 2:42-44 They were continually
devoting themselves to the apostles' teaching and to
fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.
Everyone kept feeling a sense of awe; and many wonders
and signs were taking place through the apostles. And
all those who had believed were together and had all
things in common. |
| Quote: |
| 1 Timothy 4:14 Do not neglect the
spiritual gift within you, which was bestowed on you
through prophetic utterance with the laying on of hands
by the presbytery. |
| Quote: |
| Matthew 18:17-18 If he refuses to listen
to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to
listen even to the church, treat him as you would a
pagan or a tax collector. "I tell you the truth,
whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and
whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in
heaven." | Among hundreds of other references to the
established structure of the Church, it is obvious that the
bible does not condemn the Church. To say that the Church is
apostate Christianity is to reject Church authority. To reject
Church authority is to reject the bible, since the bible came
out of the Church. To reject the bible is to reject the book
of Revelation, so the apostate theory doesn't matter since
we've already rejected the book itself.
It just
doesn't work.  _________________ A faith and knowledge
resting on the hope of eternal life, which God, who does not
lie, promised before the beginning of time. Titus 1:2
Eric | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
Eugene
Shubert Junior Member

Joined: 19 Nov 2003 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003
9:15 am Post subject:
|
|
|
| Eugene Shubert
wrote: |
drawman,
I agree that the
destruction of Jerusalem is a symbol. But if it's a
symbol that makes any sense at all, shouldn't it
represent apostate Christians who blindly follow the
established church (like the Jews did) and thus are not
truly in step with following Jesus Christ? If so,
doesn't that lead us to the conclusion that Babylon is
apostate Christianity? |
| morashb
wrote: |
I don't think so.
Keep in mind
that "Christ established the Church" and promised that
the gates of hades would not prevail against it. To
follow the Church is not what will get us into trouble.
Those who were recipients of the destruction and
rath were not those who "were blindly" following, but
actually against those who were
persecuting. | The prophet Jeremiah wrote:
"A
horrible and shocking thing has happened in the land:
The prophets prophesy lies, the priests rule by their
own authority, and my people love it this way."
Jeremiah 5:30-31.
There are many instances in
history where Protestants, Muslims and Jews have reverently
submitted their minds to their "spiritual leaders" who were,
in fact, deceiving the people with corrupt doctrines. And
their priests approved! Surely you don't mean to imply that
somehow Catholics are free from deception and that the
Catholic priesthood is beyond corruption?
I take it
from your response, for example, that Catholics deny that the
Church once sold indulgences and that credulous and
superstitious people were never led to purchase indulgences in
place of trusting in the grace of God? http://www.everythingimportant.org/theReformation
Have you ever read Luther's 95 theses? I haven't met a
Catholic yet who has said that these famous charges were
fabrications.
A huge number of Jews perished in the
general slaughter and destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. Most
of them weren't persecuting anyone but I bet that most of them
"were blindly following." Didn't they believe the lies they
were taught? "Christians were heretics that had to die to keep
their church safe and the society
pure." _________________ Then Jesus said to his
disciples, “If anyone would come after me, he must deny
himself and take up his cross and follow me.” Matthew
16:24. | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
drawman Advanced Member

Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 308 Location:
Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003
10:45 pm Post
subject: |
|
|
Eugene,
I don't see
the connection regarding the Jeremiah 5:30-31 citation,
because in Jeremiah 14:14-16 the prophet goes on to explain
that the false prophets and
their followers do not escape the wrath of God.
| Quote: |
| 14Then Yahweh said to me, ‘The prophets
are prophesying lies in my name; I have not sent them, I
gave them no orders, I never spoke to them. Delusive
visions, hollow predictions, daydreams of their own,
that is what they prophesy to you.15Therefore, Yahweh
says this: The prophets who prophesy in my name when I
have not sent them, and tell you there will be no sword
or famine in this country, these same prophets will meet
their end by sword and famine.16And as for the people to
whom they prophesy, they will be tossed into the streets
of Jerusalem, victims of famine and the sword, with not
a soul to bury them: neither them nor their wives, nor
their sons, nor their daughters. I shall pour their own
wickedness down on them |
To answer your unsolicited comments
attributing the selling of indulgences by the Catholic Church,
I must caution you that it is a very common error to attribute
the evil actions of some of the members of a group to the
entire group. _________________ Peace, Steve
M. | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
morashb Intermediate Member
Joined: 20 Jul
2002 Posts: 70 Location: Camp Lejeune, NC
|
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003
3:52 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Eugene,
You asked,
"Surely you don't mean to imply that somehow Catholics are
free from deception and that the Catholic priesthood is beyond
corruption?"
-----
Catholics are not free from
deception nor are are Catholic priests beyond corruption.
Something to consider is that the Church should be
judged by what it teaches and not by the failure of some of
its members to live up to its teachings.
This is
beginning to get somewhat off track from the initial intent of
this thread. _________________ Bob M | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
morashb Intermediate Member
Joined: 20 Jul
2002 Posts: 70 Location: Camp Lejeune, NC
|
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003
4:33 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Eugene,
When was
the Church "born?"
Who were persecuting the Church?
Who and what were destroyed in the Roman assault on
Jerusalem?
Would Christ allow Satan to overcome the
Church? _________________ Bob M | |
| Back
to top |
|
 |
|
|
|