Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 1 Location: New Delhi, India
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:04 am Post subject: Can Symmetry Guarantee Equivalence or Equality?
Let us consider two clocks, clock A and clock B. Let us say that A is running correctly, whereas clock B runs fast and slow. For one second clock B runs fast, that is it runs up two seconds; then for the next two seconds clock B runs slow and runs only one second. In a total of three seconds both the clocks run up three seconds.
A mapping of the times shown by the two clocks is given as below.
Sl No Clock A (seconds) Clock B (Seconds)
1 0 0
2 1.0 2.0
3 3.0 3.0
4 4.0 5.0
5 6.0 6.0
With the above data, clock A is convinced that clock B is running incorrectly.
Now, in the above table, the two clocks are synchronized at sl no 1, 3, 5. Let us assume we wish to synchronize the clocks at sl no 2. In order to do this we subtract 1 from all readings of clock A and 2 from all readings of clock B. The resultant table is as below.
Sl No Clock A (seconds) Clock B (Seconds)
1 -1 -2
2 0.0 0.0
3 2.0 1.0
4 3.0 3.0
5 5.0 4.0
6 6.0 6.0
Now we interchange the columns “Clock A” and “Clock B”
Sl No New Sl No Clock B (Seconds) Clock A (seconds)
1 0 -2 -1
2 1 0.0 0.0
3 2 1.0 2.0
4 3 3.0 3.0
5 4 4.0 5.0
6 5 6.0 6.0
Now, we see that the first mapping of clock A to clock B is identical to that of the second mapping seen from clock B to clock A.
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:35 am Post subject: Re: Can Symmetry Guarantee Equivalence or Equality?
chandru_iyer wrote:
Let us consider two clocks, clock A and clock B. Let us say that A is running correctly, whereas clock B runs fast and slow.
Can we say both these clocks are equivalent?
Dear Chandru,
The answer is obviously no.
You do ask an essential question: "Can Symmetry Guarantee Equivalence or Equality?" I believe that your mirror analogy on your web page states your criticism of special relativity more persuasively:
Chandru Iyer wrote:
The equations of transformation of points of object to points of image are symmetric with the inverse operation in the case of the reflecting mirror. But the object and image, as we all know, are not equivalent.
The contention of this paper is to emphasize that a mathematical symmetry or equivalence of a transformation with its inverse does not necessarily ensure the equivalence of the two entities involved.
I appreciate your insightful objection to the very lopsided appearance of SR. Did you know that there is a simple derivation of special relativity that does not invoke lopsided sounding physics principles or any requirement of group symmetry? See this derivation of the Lorentz transformation but please skip section 3:
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum