A Reform-minded Seventh-day Adventist forum
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Eastern Orthodox Church Abhors Religious Liberty

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Mount Carmel
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Eugene Shubert
the new William Miller
the new William Miller


Joined: 06 Apr 2002
Posts: 1006
Location: Richardson Texas

PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2005 11:27 am    Post subject: The Eastern Orthodox Church Abhors Religious Liberty Reply with quote

Georgia
The Georgian Constitution provides for separation of state and church, but also establishes that the Georgian Orthodox Church has played a “special role” in the country's history. A recent constitutional agreement (a so-called concordat) between the state and this church further strengthens its position. Minority religions face restrictions of their activities.

The concordat between the state and the Georgian Orthodox Church, which was signed in October 2002, grants the Georgian Orthodox Church a number of rights that other religious communities in Georgia do not enjoy. According to the concordat, the state decides, with consent of the Orthodox Church, whether other religious communities may use Orthodox symbols and terminology and whether they may build churches, publish religious literature and produce items for worship such as ecclesiastical paintings and icons. The concordat also grants the Orthodox Church tax-exempt status; the right to recover all property that previously belonged to it but that was confiscated during the Soviet era; and the right to decide who can offer religious education in schools as well as the content of such education. Representatives of minority religious communities have expressed concern that the concordat will be implemented in a way so as to further obstruct their opportunities to exercise their religious convictions.

In a development strongly condemned by human rights NGOs and monitoring bodies, members of minority religions have been subjected to severe harassment and violence in Georgia during the last few years. Orthodox extremists, who particularly have singled out Jehovah’s Witnesses, Pentecostals, Baptists and Evangelic Christians for attacks, have raided and looted private homes, destroyed places of worship, burnt religious literature and other property, and threatened and physically abused believers. The extremists have repeatedly used exceptionally brutal methods, such as beating believers with clubs and sticks spiked with nails, leaving many victims in need of hospital treatment and some with permanent injuries. Between 1999 and mid-2002, over 100 attacks have been recorded, and since then the number has increased further.

The Orthodox extremists have sought to secure public support for their attacks by claiming that the activities of religious minorities threaten the Georgian identity and the Georgian nation, both of which generally are viewed as closely linked to the Georgian Orthodox Church. The media has also contributed to strengthening suspicious attitudes against religious minorities by reporting on attacks in a prejudiced and biased manner.

Most troubling, the authorities have not responded adequately to the wave of religious violence. Police have often failed to respond to appeals by victims or have passively stood by as attacks have been carried out. In some cases police and local administration officials have also participated in attacks. What is more, while victims have filed nearly 800 complaints with prosecutors, investigations into such complaints have typically been slow, ineffective or non-existent and have rarely resulted in indictment. For example, in July 2002, 99 Jehovah’s Witnesses filed a joint application with the European Court of Human Rights, documenting 30 different cases where prosecutors and courts have declined to open criminal procedures in spite of apparent evidence of criminal acts, including eyewitness testimony, photographs and video clips. As of June 2003, not a single perpetrator of religious violence in the country had been punished. Courts have also summarily dismissed complaints by victims against police and other officials in spite of overwhelming evidence of their complicity in attacks. [1].

The Orthodox Church [in Greece] is recognized and legally protected by the state as the dominant and established religion. The constitution of 1975 removed some of the discriminatory legislation against non-Orthodox bodies, but old laws remain which are used to hinder non-Orthodox activities and persecute Protestants. Greece regularly loses cases when such are taken to the European Court of Justice, thus gradually lessening restrictions on religious minorities. [2].

One extreme example from a judicial opinion is that of Judge Valticos on the European Court of Human Rights, who differentiates between the (acceptable) Greek Orthodox Church and the (unacceptable) Jehovah’s Witness faith. A member of the latter faith, who has been convicted in Greek courts for proselytism, is described by the judge as
Quote:
a hardbitten adept of proselytism, a specialist in conversion, a martyr of the criminal courts whose earlier convictions have served only to harden him in his militancy . . . . He swoops on her, trumpets that he has good news for her (the play on words is obvious, but no doubt not to her), manages to get himself let in and, as an experienced commercial traveller and cunning purveyor of a faith he wants to spread, expounds to her his intellectual wares cunningly wrapped up in a mantle of universal peace and radiant happiness. Who, indeed, would not like peace and happiness?

This language of Judge Valticos, although extreme, illustrates the bias that can enter into legal analysis. [3].

Most Greeks brand of Christianity is Orthodoxy and they consider membership in the Orthodox Church synonymous with being Greek. 98% of the population are members though only 2% attend regularly. While evangelical ministries have grown with the expansion of religious freedoms during the last ten years, the dominating Greek Orthodox membership frequently persecutes and undermines such ministries because they consider all unendorsed Christian expressions as threats to the church. [4].

Local governments in eastern Europe, sometimes maintaining close links to Orthodox churches, have instituted patterns of discrimination against non-Orthodox individuals and groups. In Russia, non-Orthodox missionaries are virtually banned in many localities. Romanian authorities have discriminated against Jehovah's Witnesses following harsh indictments of the religion by the Romanian Orthodox Church. [5].

Prior to the rise of Islam, the Orthodox Church persecuted the non-Chalcedonian churches using the arm of the Byzantine Empire to suppress their "heresies." This explains why many members of these communities welcomed at first the Arab armies, not being fully aware of the true nature of Islamic teachings. [6].
Back to top
Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
'); //-->
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Mount Carmel All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group