When America had the characteristics of a Lamb, a person was innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The fact that my post was put here without any warning or reason shows the character of those who administrate it.
Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed [is] he that cometh in the name of the Lord. Mat. 23:38-39. _________________ Isaiah 26:20-21
The fact that my post was put here without any warning or reason shows the character of those who administrate it.
A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Don't be surprised that police officers and forum staff are authorized to arrest suspects on probable cause. It's just. Call it constitutional. You are in jail because of a reasonable assessment by Eugene Shubert that you are a threat to yourself and others.
moigboi wrote:
I wish to be an advocate for Fortitude Travesser. Now tell me the next step in your system.
Considering the statements made by Fortitude Travesser, someone will have to prove that he is competent enough to stand trial. Just about anyone can post an argument for Travesser's release in the courtroom forum. However, you're a newcomer and have an indeterminate rank so you don't qualify, yet.
Are you asking me to believe that your client is not a member of a dangerous cult?
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2004 3:15 am Post subject: Jail, how to get out, and why am I in here?
Many years ago I became a Seventh-day Adventist. Suddenly I found myself in a court. Kindly notice what happened:-
I was told I had to tell the truth.
I replied as a Seventh-day Adventist I had no problem with that.
Of course I was aware that I was up against several members of the Masonic Lodge and was also aware that Sis. White had made no friends by striking them down when in Australia. But, Tough.
The second or third questions I forget which, where ones only I knew the answer to, so answered them entirely honestly.
For this transgression of British Justice, I was severely castigated.
The next question was somewhat similar, so I hesitated and the judge barked at me to answer it.
To this I replied, I don't know that I can Sir.
He repeated his demand, and I just stood there.
Soon I was asked what the matter was, so I replied, I am the only man in all New Zealand who is capable of answering that question, but I am forbidden to do so.
The judge asked, "By whom." And was told, by you Sir. He then asked why do you say that? So I explained. I was told to answer truthfully and I did, and received a sound canning for that, presumably because I am not permitted to answer anything truthfully here.
I therefore am unable to proceed. I do not know the rules.
At this, the judge asked, "Was your previous answer the truth? And when I said, Yes, entirely so. He paused, and then advised me of a way to couch my replies in a more acceptable way.
Unfortunately I am not a politician, nor a lawyer. I don't tell lies, and I am inclined to believe what people tell me - at least until I find that they are something less than what they have claimed.
I always seek to make a clear distinction between truth and error. Something only a Seventh-day Adventist Christian is able to achieve or would even be interested in.
I am aware that, the scriptures state that, "They shall run when no man pursues." I wonder if that is what has happened now?
If so, then I accept it, and you should strike me off your list. Just as the court belonged to the judge and not to me, so this web site belongs to you and not to me.
It is evident that something has got up some one's nose rather badly.
You could possibly tell me what your problem is, or if you like just close me off and I will go away. That is what Dr. Kellogg told them, and I am just the same. It would have been nice if you could have studied things out, but I know that not everyone is capable of doing that without seriously threatening their own health.
It comes down to this: Paul asked, "Have I become your enemy because I told you the truth?" Some questions are timeless.
Sincerely,
Ross.
ps I don't drink. _________________ R.R. Pollock
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2004 11:38 am Post subject: Impenetrable posts are sent to jail
Dear Ross,
Please don't be offended that one of your threads was moved to the jail forum. If an angel or mortal spiritual genius were to post any great truths beyond the capacity of the forum administrator, then that post might easily be sent to the jail forum for having the appearance of incomprehensibility. The judgment is only the judgment of one post by one sinful judge. You are free to continue posting anywhere on this bulletin board. Would you prefer that your post be deleted and not displayed in this jail forum?
There's a bright side to everything. The Bible says, "we can do nothing against the truth, but only for the truth" (2 Corinthians 13:8). You're not being censured. This forum does not "suppress the truth in unrighteousness" (Romans 1:18). You have the right to speak.
It seems to me that you are claiming to have new light on Scripture. Surely you have tried to get it published by the church. What did they say?
As for your "transgression of British Justice," what were the questions of the court and your answers for which you were "severely castigated"?
It seems that you are criticizing others for not understanding you. Your expectations are thoroughly unreasonable. It should be easier for a genius to speak like a simpleton than for a simpleton to understand and communicate like a genius.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum