| Author
|
Topic: Reporting a church
disturbance |
Eugene Shubert
Member Member # 26
|
posted September 30, 2000 07:19 AM
I have
always regarded all the Adventist forums as churches. As such,
I have always thought that every discussion on a SDA forum
should be conducted decently and in order. As I read through
this thread, it becomes obvious that I need to repeat the
Lord’s injunction.
“Women should remain silent in the churches.
They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as
the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they
should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful
for a woman to speak in the church.” —1 Corinthians
14:34-35.
It is absolutely shameful for untaught and
unenlightened women to speak on doctrinal matters in church.
Dear Elissa,
Thanks for noticing the great displeasure directed at me.
The actual reason for everyone’s hostility is that I had announced my intent of reporting a church
disturbance. Immediately after I had started
this thread with the opening post, I had posted the following:
Yes, I do have an actual disturbance I wish to
report. I’m only checking if it’s theologically permissible
to do so.
In reflecting upon the opening question, please keep in
mind the many Spirit of Prophecy comparisons
between Seventh-day Adventists and the Jews at the time of
Christ.
When I saw that just reporting that “I do
have an actual disturbance I wish to report” was a disturbance all by itself, I quickly deleted
this second comment. I didn’t want to be thrown down the
proverbial cliff too quickly.
I first thought that I needed to discuss the theology of
relating a church disturbance before I actually report one. It
now appears that I must first explain Matthew 7:1-2:
quote:
Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye
judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it
shall be measured to you again.
This is instruction that my critics and detractors need; I
understand it. But if they presume to be teachers, I will
listen.
All you teachers of the Law, please reconcile Matthew 7:1-2
with the following judgments:
“Do not judge according to appearance, but judge
with righteous judgment.” John 7:24.
“I have written you in my letter not to associate with
immoral people—not at all meaning the people of this world
who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters.
In that case you would have to leave this world. But now I
am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who
calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy,
an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler.
With such a man do not even eat. What business is it
of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to
judge those inside? God will judge those outside. Expel the
wicked man from among you.” 1 Corinthians 5:9-13.
“But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last
days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money,
boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents,
ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous,
without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good,
treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than
lovers of God—having a form of godliness but denying its
power. Have nothing to do with them.” 2 Timothy
3:1-5. , 2000).]
Posts:
709 | From: Texas | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP:
Logged | |
Kelly Schmitt
Member Member # 191
|
posted September 30, 2000 07:47 AM
Eugene,
What about those of us without husbands? Are we permitted
to post?
Kelly
Posts:
30 | Registered: Apr 2000 | IP:
Logged
| |
Eugene Shubert
Member Member # 26
|
posted September 30, 2000 10:14 AM
Dear Kelly,
I am not the administrator of this forum. Women are
permitted to post.
If you are asking how I would run a bulletin board
according to Scripture if I had the opportunity, I will
answer.
On the issue of having untaught and unenlightened women
speaking out on doctrinal matters in church, I would start off
by dividing the forum into several sections.
There would be a picnic area for men and women. Anything
that people talk about at a picnic would be allowed there.
There would be a sacred place for sharing “present truth”
by those who are recognized as having the appropriate gifts.
That section would be set apart by its focus on the most
important topics and would be patterned after the Sabbath
School. Inspired counsel would be followed. Click here for a relevant list of inspired
counsels in a related discussion.
I would also have a general (public) town hall theological
discussion area out of which enlightened men and women could
be recognized and selected to teach important insightful
truths for the Sabbath School section. The Sabbath School
would be open to all but the inspired counsel would have to be
followed. Irrelevant and disruptive comments would be removed
and placed in a disfellowship hall area as examples of
wrongdoing. All the inappropriate comments transferred there
would be deleted after so many days.
Are there exceptions to the rule that woman should not be
allowed to speak in church? You would think so. There were
prophetesses in the early church (Acts 21:9). And of course
Ellen White was God’s messenger. Our recognition of that fact
gives her the right to speak whenever she wants. There might
be many women today with instruction for the church but they
need to be recognized first. Even men shouldn’t presume that
they have something to say.
God’s word says,
quote:
Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers,
because you know that we who teach will incur a stricter
judgment. —James 3:1.
How much more is this true of women!
2000).]
Posts:
709 | From: Texas | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP:
Logged | |
Ed White
Member Member # 296
|
posted September 30, 2000 11:32 AM
Eugene...Your words. "There would be a sacred place for
sharing “present truth” by those who are recognized as having
the appropriate gifts. That section would be set apart by its
focus on the most important topics and would be patterned
after the Sabbath School. Inspired counsel would be followed.
Click here for a relevant list of inspired counsels in a
related discussion."Tell me, would your name be on the list that have these
"appropriate gifts"??? You once labeled me a Shepherd Rod
teacher, only to discover that you are the one who is still
clinging to their erroneous teaching. Ed White
Posts:
640 | Registered: Apr 2000 | IP:
Logged
| |
dolf
New Member Member # 950
|
posted September 30, 2000 12:22 PM
Eugene,
How is it you believe your remarks qualify as Principled or
Responsible Dissent?
A case in point is the following correspondence which was
disseminated to 3 individuals with whom I have no
association:--"My dear friend [A member of the Catholic
community of faith who frequently inpugnes
alt.religion.christian.adventist forum membership], how are
you doing? I'm saddened to hear that a few godless characters
who misrepresent themselves as Christians have troubled you.
Please do not assume that they are members in good standing
in the Seventh-day Adventist church. I do not know [???] or
[???] but I do know Dolf Boek. I do not believe he is an
Adventist. His website displays no love of the gospel of the
kingdom but rather of an obsession with Greek philosophy and
bizarre sounding titles like, 'The Sodomite Prophecy.'
He routinely posts irrational gibberish on Adventist
bulletin boards. He is clearly not sane. His association with
[???] and [???] proves the worth of the three. The email from
[???] is clearly rude and obnoxious. Please consider these
three as members of a lunatic fringe but not of the
Seventh-day Adventist church." [Internet Personality known as
'Eugene Shubert', 4th May, 2000]
- dolf
Posts:
3 | From: North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia |
Registered: Apr 2001 | IP: Logged
| |
Eugene Shubert
Member Member # 26
|
posted September 30, 2000 12:41 PM
Ed White,
I could tell you of supernatural revelation I’ve received
from the Lord and being admonished by Him in a dream through
an angel but you wouldn’t believe. But for those who can
recognize revelation, they would put my name on the list of
true messengers with a message.
As for all the lies by Satan’s puppets meant to disrupt the
messages of the Lord, I refer you to two threads:
Debate and controversy a device of
Satan Satan’s Agents Are On This Forum
Sincerely,
Eugene Shubert
Posts:
709 | From: Texas | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP:
Logged | |
|
|
Ed White
Member Member # 296
|
posted September 30, 2000 01:06 PM
Eugene...Yes I found something that was posted on
8/12/2000 that needs to be reposted here.
"Eugene…You bring up a good point that the Bible and SOP
has already answered for you, so this thread will not be
short.
“Every unconverted man is fascinated, bewildered, by the
bewitching power of the great deceiver. Paul wrote to the
Galatians, "Who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey
the truth?" Every person who cherishes a known error, in faith
or practice, is under the power of sorcery, and is practicing
sorcery upon others. Satan employs him to mislead other
souls.” Signs of the Times, May 18, 1882. Some of this
“known error” on this forum will be cherished to the bitter
end because that’s the way they were taught. Then Pride of
opinion enters in after 30 years under their belt believing
that way. But it need not be. “Most difficulties could be
cleared up in 5 min. if we would only humble ourselves and say
we are sorry’’ . Ed White" Ed White
Posts:
640 | Registered: Apr 2000 | IP:
Logged
| |
Eugene Shubert
Member Member # 26
|
posted September 30, 2000 01:30 PM
Given the original purpose of this thread, is there
anyone out there who denies the truthfulness of the following
two inspired paragraphs that I have already quoted?
“I solemnly charge you in the presence of God
and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the
dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom: preach the word;
be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke,
exhort, with great patience and instruction.” 2 Timothy
4:1-2.
“Satan has laid every measure possible that
nothing shall come among us as a people to reprove and
rebuke us, and exhort us to put away our errors.” TM 411.
Is anyone out there capable of discussing the simple
theological question that I posed at the beginning of this
thread?
Posts:
709 | From: Texas | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP:
Logged | |
dolf
New Member Member # 950
|
posted September 30, 2000 02:08 PM
I lay
charge against you, that on the subject of 'Malakh Habbalah',
you do not engaged in 'Principled or Responsible Dissent':
"If there are poor among you, any one of your brethren, in
any of your cities [HT: gates] in your land which Hashem, your
G-d gives you, you shall not harden your hearts, nor shall you
close [Neofiti mg: the same verb: tqspwn for tqpswn:
metathesis] your hands from your brethren; But you shall
surely open your hands to him, and you shall surely provide
him in proportion to his lack, which is lacking to him. Take
heed of yourselves lest in your malicious [haughtiness;
Literally: behind your haughty] heart there be a sinful word,
saying: 'The seventh year, the year of release, is drawing
near,' and you are displeased with your poor brother and you
do not give him (anything), and he cry out before the L-rd
against you, lest there be sin in you [Literally debt or guilt
in/upon you]. You shall give to him freely, and it must not
look displeasing in your sight when you give [Literally: be
evil in your face] to him because on account of this thing the
L-rd your G-d will bless you in all the work of your hands."
[© 1997 The Order of Saint Benedict, Aramaic Targum Neofiti 1:
Deuteronomy 15:7-10]
- dolf
Posts:
3 | From: North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia |
Registered: Apr 2001 | IP: Logged
| |
|
|
Aletha
Member Member # 399
|
posted September 30, 2000 10:12 PM
Brethren,
Satan, that old serpent, the devil is exulting over this
thread! Satan is getting his way with these arguments.
I'm praying for all of you, especially for brother Eugene.
I'm getting the feeling that you haven't been praying for me,
Eugene, considering that you have accused me of being
unlearned and a woman (Oh dear!). Brother Eugene,
all I have to say is to never underestimate the power of
God.
"If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is
a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen,
how can he love God whom he hath not seen? And this
commandment have we from Him, that he who loveth God love his
brother also." I John 4:20,21
Our Father God, please humble our hearts and speak to us
through your Holy Spirit! AMEN!!
Peace and Blessings to all of you!!
Aletha
Posts:
34 | From: Birmingham, United Kingdom |
Registered: May 2000 | IP: Logged
| |
Miss M
New Member Member # 509
|
posted October 13, 2000 11:33 AM
AMEN
ALETHA!
God uses anyone he sees would be an instrument to
bring more souls into His kingdom, and that includes women!
Posts:
3 | Registered: Jun 2000 | IP:
Logged
| |
Doug Meis
Member Member # 25
|
posted October 13, 2000 09:51 PM
Eugene, >> There would be a sacred place for
sharing “present truth” by those who are recognized as having
the appropriate gifts <<
According to that Jesus would not be allowed to speak in
the synagogue of His day.
You sure seem down on not only women but a lot of others
who dont happen to hold degrees. Who says that a bum from the
street cant know God better than you? Maybe God has given him
a message. You want a very controlling and suppressive atmosphere. I would never belong to such a discussion group.
If I ran things here, I'd lock both you and Dolf in a
private room and let you both destroy each other.
Sheesh. --Ðøug
Posts:
826 | From: CA (GMT-8) Think Rain n Snow - I love
it | Registered: Mar 2000 | IP:
Logged | |
|
| |