The Father, Son and Holy Spirit ask, "Why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?" (Matthew 7:3).

djconklin replies, "Why should I reply to a plank in the eye? I'm a great scholar with a clerical collar. I'm too noble to holler at Adventist squalor.

"Give me a dollar and I promise to perch. There are risks to research the sins of the church. You know my passion for praise and high fashion. I reject the mission of your sedition logician. I have no retort for a scary report. I will not squander my time of joy to wander. It's preposterous to ponder the way out yonder.

"You must be pleased with my great mind and knowledge. I've spent many years at an Adventist college. I learned all the plays and the tricks of the trade. I know not to join a righteous parade.

"I will not betray my Church with a thoughtful display. I will not say it's going astray. Being a reformer is so passé. I refuse to obey Christ in a perilous way.

"I know my own heart, and soul and way. Truth decay is an old cliché. It is often alleged that the church is corrupt and medieval. I do not believe it requires upheaval. I once looked for the evil on top of the roof. I looked all around and saw no proof. Do not trouble me again with your pesky plea. I do not await your jubilee. Improbable events are very rare. I do not care for the house of prayer.

"I will not listen to your sedition logician. The work of Satan I dare not straighten."

djconklin wrote: Get out of my tea. That is deceptive sophistry.

No said the man that is free. I created a farcical soliloquy to illustrate your undeniable bigotry. You are simply too shortsighted to see.

djconklin wrote:I'm not a bigot in a tree. You are stating blasphemy.

It is not blasphemy you Pharisee. You are the blasphemer, not me.
Just as the Pharisee can't understand my soliloquy, the bigot can't recognize his bigotry.

djconklin wrote: > I'm a great scholar with a clerical collar.
I'm neither;

I agree that you're not a great scholar. You're obviously not even a deep thinker. The proof is that you clearly misunderstand my farcical soliloquy. My point here is that you imagine yourself to be an intellectual and that you judge yourself to be superior intellectually. The proof of this charge is that you have boasted at having published scholarly material and challenged me for evidence that I met your standard of intellectual excellence. "I published this and that" and "What have you ever published?"

Do you wear a clerical collar? Certainly not literally. Are you a papist in the sense of having a haughty spirit in your defense of the holy order? I believe it's clear that you fit the profile. http://www.everythingimportant.org/gospel/7faces.htm

Jamie-Lee wrote:I'm a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and do a lot of voluntary work for the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

A couple of our clients were talking to me about this website, some of our most valued customers, and they had complained of rudeness, serious intimidation, stalking behavior, and repeated campaigns of hatred and threats.

They said to me in a loud voice so the whole office could hear them that they would never join the Seventh-day Adventist Church when Seventh-day Adventist Church members behave the way the Seventh-day Adventist Church members behave on this website.

We are particularly disturbed with the behavior of username 'djconklin' due to his rudeness and serious intimidation to extract money through stalking behavior and harassment. And anyone who is being stalked and intimidated to hand over money through threats and extortion should contact their local Police Department.

I have written a letter to the Seventh-day Adventist General Conference about this matter and website and the comments posted. This type of behavior has no place in the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

His name is David J. Conklin. And I'm certain that the General Conference Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists will recognize immediately from seeing David J. Conklin's extortion scheme and behavior online that he is obviously robbing the Corporation of a lot more money than he is contributing to it. And be sure that if David Conklin attempts to bring a lawsuit against me that I too will contact the special moneyed interests of the Corporation to see how they might feel about my attorney making this church approved Pharisee a laughing stock for the viewers of my website.
http://www.everythingimportant.org/SDA/

To the best of my knowledge and belief, David J. Conklin was the first to come up with the scam of being so unquestionably contemptible online that many that couldn't control their disgust of him would say what they feel about him publicly so he could then respond seemingly justifiably with threats of lawsuits and attempts at extortion.

David Koot wrote:There are several who HAVE been posting on this board, who are mentally ill, by their own admission or otherwise.

Yes, and David J. Conklin is on record revealing his Satanic delight in tormenting them with his threats of a costly lawsuit, obviously causing them to suffer incredible mental anguish while at the same time trying to extort money from them.

David Koot wrote:"If you prick us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison us, do we not die? and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?" (Scene 3, Act 1)

And if you continue in your grievous sins that you love so dearly, shall not the Supreme Judge ask the angels to take out the trash thereby throwing you, David Koot, along with other haters of Jesus, like David J. Conklin, into the lake of fire?

Comforter wrote:My dear Shubee, may I ask you a question please and ask that you answer honestly. In your heart of hearts, do you really believe that David Koot and David J. Conklin hate Jesus?

David J. Conklin belongs to the cult of self. Count all the time and energy he devotes to himself in his huge post count. By any metric, the numbers that indicate self-preoccupation are astronomical. That makes him a high-ranking Pharisee. David Koot and David J. Conklin are both Pharisees.

A disciple of Jesus said, "Do not repay evil with evil or insult with insult, but with blessing, because to this you were called so that you may inherit a blessing" (1 Peter 3:9). Do Pharisees obey that command? Did that teaching come from Jesus? Jesus said, "He who does not love Me does not keep My words" (John 14:24). And in the judgment Jesus will ask, "Why do you call Me,‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?"

There is no doubt in my mind that David Koot and David J. Conklin both love the law of the land above the commands of Jesus. Obviously, their highest priority is to find any excuse they can to serve their carnal natures.

Comforter wrote:In your heart of hearts, do you really believe that David Koot and David J. Conklin hate Jesus?
I do not believe that for a second.

Every unconverted, unrepentant Christian on Earth loves the Jesus-is-a-free-ticket-to-heaven Jesus. Do you in your heart of hearts believe that David Koot and David J. Conklin love the true Jesus that requires martyrdom for the cause of truth? Matthew 10:27-28, 38-39; Rev 12:11.

John 12
23 Jesus replied,“The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. 24 Very truly I tell you, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds. 25 Anyone who loves their life will lose it, while anyone who hates their life in this world will keep it for eternal life. 26 Whoever serves me must follow me; and where I am, my servant also will be. My Father will honor the one who serves me."

The master said: "I am the good shepherd; the good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. He who is a hireling, and not a shepherd, who is not the owner of the sheep, beholds the wolf coming, and leaves the sheep, and flees, and the wolf snatches them, and scatters them. He flees because he is a hireling, and is not concerned about the sheep." John 10:11-13 NASB.

"We know love by this, that he laid down his life for us; and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren." 1 John 3:16.

djconklin wrote:>Why did Ellen G White and God forbid Christians suing each other?
Good questions except there's no proof for it.

Unquestionably, your assertion proves that you are willfully blind and are wrapped up in a Satanic delusion. Like the sinful world, you simply insist on believing what you want to believe.

"Millions in bondage to sin, slaves of Satan, doomed to suffer the second death, would refuse to listen to the words of truth in their day of visitation. Terrible blindness! strange infatuation!" GC88 22.2.

Here are the Scriptures that Conklin refuses to listen to:

1 Corinthians 6

Lawsuits Among Believers

1 If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people? 2 Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? 3 Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! 4 Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, do you ask for a ruling from those whose way of life is scorned in the church? 5 I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? 6 But instead, one brother takes another to court—and this in front of unbelievers!

7 The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated? 8 Instead, you yourselves cheat and do wrong, and you do this to your brothers and sisters. 9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.