A Reform-minded Seventh-day Adventist forum
 
In our aim to exalt everything important, first and foremost, we seek to promote a clear understanding of
Daniel, Revelation, the three angels' messages and the alpha and omega of apostasy.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

How did the SDA church become Trinitarian?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Subtle Misunderstanding
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mickey
pseudo 7th-day Adventist
pseudo 7th-day Adventist


Joined: 27 May 2002
Posts: 144
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2002 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Amen Steve! Very well answered. You know, it continues to amaze me how the word "son" when its used in connection with Jesus is said to have such a broad-based meaning that encompasses every single possible allegorical definition that could be attached to it but yet is totally exclucive of its basic and literal meaning! Unbelievable! Trinitarians throw away the most obvious meaning of "son" in order to escape the truth of Christ's literal sonship just like the sunday sabbath proponents throw away the whole of the ten commandments to escape the claims of the Sabbath of the Lord. They tell us that the literal sonship of Christ is not in the bible yet they fail to produce the allegories and the direct statements from the bible substantiating their claim that Christ is not the Son of God. They ask us to ignore the scriptures while yielding to their intellectual philosophies. Does something smell fishy to you, brother?

I think that the following quote that you have cited sums up the picture quite nicely and accurately:

"Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God." 1John 4:15

This harmonizes with the words of Jesus to Peter after Peter made the following confession of faith:

Matthew 16:16-17 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

It only serves to follow that those who stubbornly refuse to confess that Jesus is the Son of God in the face of overwhelming scriptural evidence is a sign that God is not dwelling within such a person and certainly is not speaking His word through that person.

One more thing, brother Steve that's worthy of note. What does the bible require of an individual as a pre-requisite of faith for baptism? The answer:

Acts 8:36-37 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

Did the eunuch proclaim that he believed that Jesus "entered into the ROLE of the Son"??? No, absolutely not! He confessed his faith, as did the apostle Peter before him, that Jesus is the SON OF GOD!

What was the FIRST thing that the newly converted Paul preached?

Acts 9:20 And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God.

Does it say that Paul preached a ROLE-PLAYING Son??? No! So then why are SDA's???

The apostle John tells us that ONLY CERTAIN people with a CERTAIN belief will overcome the world. Wanna guess what that belief is?

1 John 5:5 Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?

No one is going to overcome the world while they choose to believe in a doctrine of the world - in the trinity of the beast.

The devils believe and tremble. Do you know what those devils believe and tremble about?

James 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

The devils also believe that Jesus is the Son of the One God and they do tremble!

Matthew 8:29 And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?

Mark 3:11 And unclean spirits, when they saw him, fell down before him, and cried, saying, Thou art the Son of God.

Luke 4:41 And devils also came out of many, crying out, and saying, Thou art Christ the Son of God. And he rebuking them suffered them not to speak: for they knew that he was Christ.

Wow, the devils making the same confession as Peter! Could it be to a ROLE-PLAYING son???

Mark 5:7 And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not.

Hmm. Interesting. The devils here elaborate and proclaim that Jesus is the Son of the MOST HIGH GOD! The Father is the MOST HIGH GOD. Christ is the SON OF THE MOST HIGH GOD! Can the scriptures get any plainer? Preachers, teachers, pastors, and evangelists refuse to believe the plain utterances of scripture. The devils, damned as they may be, seem to be one up on some of these characters who claim to be ambassadors of God's truth!

John 11:27 She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world.

This woman confesses that Jesus is the Son of God which should come into the world. He CAME to the world ALREADY as God's Son, not as the trinity teaches that He came to the world and BECAME God's Son. Big difference!

Steve, the bible is so replete with references to the fact that Christ is God's Son that its mind-boggling to see so many stubbornly refuse to see this truth. Trinitarians cannot even produce not even one one hundredth of the scripture verses to prove their view as we have been easily producing which teach the non-trinitarian position.

The biblical facts are there. They cannot be refuted. I pray the Lord will open the eyes of those who for whatever reason cannot see beyond the traditon of men at this time.
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
Steve
pseudo 7th-day Adventist
pseudo 7th-day Adventist


Joined: 09 Jun 2002
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2002 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Amen Mickey, well said
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
dedication
Seventh-day Adventist
Seventh-day Adventist


Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 137
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dedication,

Why is it that the view that you espouse sounds so much like the Catholic view? Did the Catholic church get that part right and miss everything else? The Catholic Church claims to be the originator of the Trinity belief. They also recognize no direct scriptural support for this belief.


What is the Catholic view?
They may give lip service to a view simular to the truth, HOWEVER, they believe in a MOTHER, SON God--
To them MARY is the mother of God and queen of heaven, and therefore is raised to high status as co-redemptress, co-mediator with Christ. That is hardly our view.

Now I ask you--
The Catholics also claim to be the originators of the Bible--
They claim they are the ones who collected the letters of apostles and decided what was and what was not to be in the Bible.

Are you going to throw that out too?
There is no text in the scriptures that say "Hebrews, 1st and 2nd Peter, James and 1st, 2nd, 3rd John, and the Revelation by John, are scripture, BUT "Acts of Peter, Revelation of Peter, and the gospel of the Hebrews" are not scripture.

No text anywhere to tell us that.
All the above books were at one time or other considered or disputed as scripture, however, by the year 400 A.D. at the Council of Carthage, the New Testament was fixed exactly the way we protestants regard it today.


Last edited by dedication on Wed Aug 07, 2002 11:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Send private message Visit poster's website  
'); //-->
dedication
Seventh-day Adventist
Seventh-day Adventist


Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 137
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To be from everlasting to everlasting-- means without beginning or end. That is the quality of the true God.

No, derived god can be the TRUE GOD.
Christ is not derived, He is not procreated.

Yes, He became the literal SON OF GOD for our salvation.-- but He is from all eternity-- one with the Father.

It's interesting-- I have also studied the sanctuary doctrine extensively--- Christ's two phase ministry for our salvation, -- it too, is all through the Bible, yet I can't say any one passage in scripture totally defines it-- BUT IT IS VERY MUCH in the Bible---
--and people will critisize us because there is no text that says in 1844 Christ entered the most holy place and began the investigative judgment, in that many words.
Yet, there are so many texts that support it!

It runs like a ribbon of TRUTH through all through the Bible.

The same with the eternal nature of Christ.
He has life underived, self existant, eternal. He is the fountain of LIFE.

The texts so commonly considered to be about the FATHER in the Old Testament-- The LORD YOUR GOD-- are often refering to Christ! For He is the LORD ALMIGHTY that appeared to Abraham and talked to Him. (Gen. 17:1) He spoke to Israel, He lead them in the cloud of fire and the pillar of cloud.

The Bible says HE IS FROM EVERLASTING TO EVERLASTING-- (Ps. 90:2)
Without father or mother, without beginning of life or end of days. Hebrews 7:3
Back to top
Send private message Visit poster's website  
'); //-->
dedication
Seventh-day Adventist
Seventh-day Adventist


Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 137
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is God the Father like?

Jesus said, "If we have seen HIM, CHRIST, then we have seen the FATHER!" If we know CHRIST, we know the FATHER! If we beleive in Christ, we believe in the FATHER! (John 12:44, John 14:9-11, 10:30) For Jesus and the Father are ONE! Two persons, BUT ONE GOD.
Back to top
Send private message Visit poster's website  
'); //-->
dedication
Seventh-day Adventist
Seventh-day Adventist


Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 137
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We do not deny that Christ is called the SON OF GOD-- the term connotates the closeness, and ONEness of the two, -- it also connotates the humility of Christ as He did not count equality with God a thing to cling to, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, humbled himself and placed Himself in a position of total dependance upon the FATHER.

WHY IS THERE THIS EMPHASES upon Christ being the Son of God and God being the Father in the New Testament. Remember earlier you pretty much tried to do away with all the Old Testament Texts that spoke of (plurality in the Godhead) It seems to me that this whole “belief” you are teaching is in all actuality doing away with the Godhood of Christ. Yes, it still gives lip service to the divinity of Christ-- but once someone really takes hold of that doctrine there is NO WAY THEY CAN VIEW CHRIST AS GOD AND WORSHIP HIM. FOR THE BIBLE IS PLAIN that we are to worship the ONE TRUE GOD-- if Christ is not the ONE TRUE GOD, then He is not a god to be worshiped-- for we are to worship ONLY the One true God. To go against the full Godhood of Christ yet believing He is a lesser god, is truly paganism-- the trinity is truth of ONE GOD IN THREE PERSONS. In perfect unity.

Now why this emphasis that Christ WAS THE SON OF GOD. (A term not found in the Old Testament except in allegorical terms-- though Christ was IN THE BEGINNING WITH GOD, and HE WAS GOD (See John 1:1)

Christ became not only the Son of God, but also the Son of Man. This is the KEY element in the New testament concerning Christ Jesus.

“Thus Paul speaks of Christ as a descendant of David according to His human nature (Rom. 1:3) and as “Son of God…according to the Spirit of holiness” (Rom 1:4) two natures in a single person. In the Epistle to the Hebrews one finds from the very start a systematic development of Christ’s two natures in one person. The first chapter proclaims Christ’s deity (verses 2,3,6,8,10-12) while the second chapter elaborates on His humanity (verse 9,14,16,17) The same personal union is recounted in Paul’s description of Christ as being in the very form (nature) of God, yet, regarding His humanity, making Himself nothing, taking the very form (nature, again) of a servant, and being made in human likeness (Phil. 2-6-8) John likewise, attest that the Word, who is God, became flesh, and that Christ, having a divine and human nature, dwelled among humans (John 1:1-18) (page 169 Handbook of SDA Theology)

Christ was human, there was no question about that as He walked the dusty roads of Judea and Galilee.

John 6.42

And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?


That is how they perceived Christ--

They denied that Christ came from the very “bosom” of God, to reveal God. This denial comes from those who refuse to see the full Godhood in Christ the Son. Do you believe that Christ came forth from the very essence of the Godhood in heaven when He came to this earth to redeem mankind. Do you believe it was GOD WITH US, when Christ was born in Bethlehem. Was it the TRUE GOD WITH US, or was it a lesser Being?

Matthew 1.23

"Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. "


Yes, Christ is the real Son of God, born of a virgin in Bethlehem. God (known to us as the SON OF GOD) became human, lowering Himself from the most exalted position in the universe to became one of us, for our salvation. He totally emptied Himself, and became totally dependant and obedient to His Heavenly Father. He came to be our brother-- leading us in example to look up and to see God as Father.

John 8.42
"Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. "

John 16.28
"I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father."


All these texts tell us that CHRIST CAME FORTH from the very essence of the Godhood, and came into the world. It DOES NOT MEAN He came into initial existance by a birth processes--- He came forth from God into the world and was born of a virgin and was called EmmanuEL, which being interpreted is, GOD WITH US,

So yes, while the Jews were saying Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven? John 6.42



The Apostles were declaring that Jesus was the SON OF GOD-- HE CAME FORTH FROM THE THRONE OF GOD-- to REVEAL GOD TO MANKIND.

His was no mere human origin-- He came forth from the throne of God, became a human.

His origin was not in the womb like everyone else that was born on this earth, He came forth from God and through the birth process became human.



Would people say Jesus was only the son of Joseph, or as some who deny Christ’s incarnation today -- the son of some Roman soldier-- or was HE THE DIVINE SON OF GOD!

To deny that He CAME FROM GOD and was as truly the SON OF GOD as He was the SON OF MAN, was to deny the FULL GODHEAD-- including THE FATHER in heaven.
Back to top
Send private message Visit poster's website  
'); //-->
Steve
pseudo 7th-day Adventist
pseudo 7th-day Adventist


Joined: 09 Jun 2002
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 1:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The Trinity is the term employed to signify the central doctrine of the Christian religion -- the truth that in the unity of the Godhead there are Three Persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, these Three Persons being truly distinct one from another. Thus, in the words of the Athanasian Creed: "the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are not three Gods but one God." (The Catholic Encyclopedia: The Blessed Trinity)


also

Quote:
In God there are three persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, equal in all perfections. (The Convert's Catechism of Catholic Doctrine p31)


This is the Catholic view. And yes this sounds like your view. It is also interesting that you bring the same argument that the evangelicals brought to our leaders in the mid 1950's saying our view relegated Jesus to the place of a second deity. From that point our leaders rejected our past teachings. And from that point we (Adventist) were accepted into the fellowship of the Evangelicals. It should also be noted that the Evangelicals put Ellen White's writings right there with the rest and so her writings were "edited" in order to more adequetly support the Trinitarian view. ( see in Eternity magazine Sept. 1956).

As we have stated there is no denial of the deity, eternity, power, etc. of Christ. It is claimed that we are saying these things because you can't see how Christ could have all these characteristics and still be the litteral Son of God.

Now, are there any Scriptures that say Jesus Christ is not the LITTERAL SON OF GOD?

What is the role of the Father in the Trinity view of God?


Last edited by Steve on Thu Aug 08, 2002 1:14 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
dedication
Seventh-day Adventist
Seventh-day Adventist


Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 137
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SDAPioneer wrote:
The Father has given all things into the hands of Christ

Dedication contradicts herself with this statement
dedication wrote:
Remember that God the FATHER HAS placed Christ in full "command" of the salvation of mankind.-- He has given all things into His--Christ's hands. (John 3:35)
Hmmm??? If the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are equal in all respects, none of them lesser than the other, then how can the Father give something to the Son. For the Fathers possessions would also be the Son’s. If Christ is equal to the Father, why is the Father giving Christ anything? According to the "un-true" SDA trinity doctrine, these things Christ already possessed. So, how can another give you what is yours already? Would a child of God speak such confusion?


The only confusion is with those who oppose the majesty of the Godhood! Of course God the Father and Christ Jesus are equal. But they DO DIFFERNENT THINGS-- it was Christ who took upon Himself the human form and died for us, it is Christ who is our High Priest! In Christ's hands was placed the responsibility of reconciling the world unto Himself. Reconciling the world unto God.

Just because someone gives someone something does not make him superior! That is the sinful way of looking at giving and taking. Turning it into controlling and making others obligated to oneself.

God is giving--
Christ gave up His position in heaven to come to this earth to save us
God risked the closest relationship beyond anything we know, as God the Father remained in heaven and Christ came to this earth to be a human.

But with God there is no rivalry. The plan of salvation was given into the hands of Christ-- that is HIS ROLE! The Father remained in heaven, the ONE upon whom Christ depended, just as we must depend upon Christ.
As the Father was the head of Christ, so Christ is the head of the church.

And the roles each member of the Godhead has taken has nothing to do with play acting. It cost CHRIST HIS LIFE on cruel cross, so you and I have the opportunity of salvation.
Back to top
Send private message Visit poster's website  
'); //-->
Steve
pseudo 7th-day Adventist
pseudo 7th-day Adventist


Joined: 09 Jun 2002
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Again, what is the role of the Father in the Trinitarian view?
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
dedication
Seventh-day Adventist
Seventh-day Adventist


Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 137
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 1:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steve wrote:
Quote:
The Trinity is the term employed to signify the central doctrine of the Christian religion -- the truth that in the unity of the Godhead there are Three Persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, these Three Persons being truly distinct one from another. Thus, in the words of the Athanasian Creed: "the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are not three Gods but one God." (The Catholic Encyclopedia: The Blessed Trinity)

also
Quote:
In God there are three persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, equal in all perfections. (The Convert's Catechism of Catholic Doctrine p31)


This is the Catholic view. And yes this sounds like your view.



Sounds to me like EGW's view as well:

SPTB07.063.002

“There are three living persons of the heavenly trio; in the name of these three great powers--the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit-- those who receive Christ by living faith are baptized,” (See Matt. 28:19)

RH.1906-04-05.007
"The Lord Jesus Christ, the divine Son of God, existed from
eternity, a distinct person, yet one with the Father
. He was the
surpassing glory of heaven. He was the commander of the heavenly
intelligences, and the adoring homage of the angels was received by him
as his right."

BT.1906-03-01

1. The Father is all the fullness of the Godhead bodily, and is invisible to mortal sight.
2. The Son is all the fullness of the Godhead manifested. …
3. The Spirit is all the fullness of the Godhead, making manifest the power of divine grace

Councils on Health p. 222
The Godhead was stirred with pity for the race, and the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit gave themselves to the working out of the plan of redemption.

Manuscript Release 7:299
Written in 1899
"We need to realize that the Holy Spirit, who is as much a person as God is a person, is walking through these grounds, that the Lord God is our keeper, and helper. He hears every word we utter and knows every thought of the mind.:



Quote:
It is also interesting that you bring the same argument that the evangelicals brought to our leaders in the mid 1950's saying our view relegated Jesus to the place of a second deity. From that point our leaders rejected our past teachings.


Your view does relegate Christ to the place of a second, lesser Deity. I have dealt with several people promoting your view, and everytime it comes down to that.

I've been accused of worshipping a three ring circus of gods--
hurtful words--

There is ONLY ONE GOD, ONE DEITY-- the Bible is plain on that:

You either accept the truth that, that ONE DEITY is comprised of three eternal persons who are in perfect unity,

or---

you worship several different Gods,-- and it has been stated over and over again by you folk that CHRIST is not the TRUE GOD, only the Father is the TRUE GOD-- If Christ is not the true God, then He must be a different, lesser God--

or--

you must deny that Christ is God, for there is ONLY ONE GOD, and HIM alone we are to worship
--- some have gone so far as to tell me that basically we don't pray to Christ, we actually pray to the Father-- that Christ is just a "channel" directing our prayers to God. That is definately making Christ a lesser god.

The whole thing just boils down to the denial that Christ is truly God, no matter how much lip serve is then made to make it appear that they still believe He is God. In one sentence they quote partial texts trying to proves only the FATHER is the true God to the exclusion of Christ. Then they say there's only ONE God, and Christ is not that One God.

Where does that leave the godhood of Christ?
It totally denies it--- no matter how much you say it doesn't.



Quote:
And from that point we (Adventist) were accepted into the fellowship of the Evangelicals. It should also be noted that the Evangelicals put Ellen White's writings right there with the rest and so her writings were "edited" in order to more adequetly support the Trinitarian view. ( see in Eternity magazine Sept. 1956).


Those words that "more adequetly support the Trinitarian view" have been seen to be written by HER OWN HAND. In her own handwriting.


Now, are there any Scriptures that say Jesus Christ is not the LITERAL SON OF GOD?

Hebrews
Our priest is without father or mother, without beginning nor end. And Jesus is our Priest.

Hebrews 7:3
"Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, remains a priest continually.
7:14
"Now it is evident that our Lord arose from Judah...and it is yet far more evident if, just like Melchizedek, there arises another priest who has come, not according to the law of fleshly commandments, but according to the power of an endless life.
Back to top
Send private message Visit poster's website  
'); //-->
dedication
Seventh-day Adventist
Seventh-day Adventist


Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 137
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 2:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

God the FATHER IS GOD-- in the fullest, completest sense.
How can any finite human spell out the role of the INFINITE HOLY GOD?

I only know what His role was NOT--
He was not the person of the Godhood who died upon the cross,
He was not the person of the Godhood who is our High Priest,

And yet--

"God Himself was crucified with Christ; for Christ was one with the Father." {FLB 50.4}
"God himself suffered in the suffering of his Son. While Jesus walked the earth in the habiliments of humanity, he could say, "I and my Father are one" Having undertaken the work of redemption, the Lord spares nothing, however costly, which is essential to the completion of his design. {ST, March 5, 1896 par. 8}"

Were I able fully to set forth God, I should either be a god myself, or God himself would cease to be what he is." The greatness of God cannot be measured or comprehended. And that doctrine that denies the absolute Godhead of Jesus Christ, denies also the Godhead of the Father; for no man knoweth the Son but the Father. {ST, June 27, 1895 par. 3}
Back to top
Send private message Visit poster's website  
'); //-->
Steve
pseudo 7th-day Adventist
pseudo 7th-day Adventist


Joined: 09 Jun 2002
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 5:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ellen White does not hold to the catholic view. In her statements in the book Patriarchs and Prophets she says that Jesus is the ONLY being that could enter into the counsel of God (PP 34,36). Ellen White contradicts herself or your interpretation is wrong. The catholic view says three persons make up one God, but Ellen White says three powers come together for one purpose, our salvation. For that matter all heaven has been enlisted to aid in this great work.

The Bible says that there are two in the counsel of peace (Zech. 6:12,13). In the book of Revelation there is described two beings with highest authority, God and the Lamb:

"And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it." Rev. 21:22

"And he showed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb." Rev. 22:1

The Bible also says that there only two we need to know about in order to have eternal life:

"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." John 17:3

Now interestingly "there are three that bear record in heaven" (1John 5:7) "and there are three that bear witness in earth" (v. 8) six powers witness altogether but they all witness to the same thing:

"And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son." 1John 5:11

Now with regard to Melchisedec,

Hebrews 7:3 sites this priest being without father or mother, not having "beginning of days, nor end of life". Since that is impossible for a human being in a litteral interpretation then this cannot mean that this person, Melchisedec was never born or never died or never had a father or mother. Simply it means that there was not a record of it, which was all important in the priesthood in order to serve as priest.

"And verily they that are of the sons of levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, have a commandment to take tithes of the people according to the law, that is of their brethren, though they come out of the loins of Abraham: But HE WHOSE DESCENT IS NOT COUNTED from them received tithes of Abraham, and blessed him that had the promises." Heb. 7:5,6

This text is pointing to the priesthood of Christ the origin and scope of it and not the origin of Melchisedec or Jesus Christ.

Finally, the Trinity concept does not as many feel elevate Christ to a higher position, because Christ position is the same in the mind of the Trinitarian (in his view) and the non-Trinitarian (in his view). We believe that Jesus is one with the Father and that he has every characteristic of the Father (immortality, power, etc.) because He is His Son. However, I do believe that the Trinitarian belief demotes God the Father to a mere figurehead.

For example:

1.) If they are all equal in authority why does one send the other?
2.) If Jesus is our savior and died for us and the Holy Spirit is the one who gives us power to overcome sin and calls us, what do we need the Father for?
3.) If they are all of equal authority why would Jesus need to present anything to the Father (blood, etc.) for the remission of our sins?

If three people form a commitee and two of the people do all the work then that makes the third member a figurehead.
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
Mickey
pseudo 7th-day Adventist
pseudo 7th-day Adventist


Joined: 27 May 2002
Posts: 144
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 7:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If three people form a commitee and two of the people do all the work then that makes the third member a figurehead


Excellent question, Steve. SDA's contend that one of the "divine beings entered into the ROLE of the Father". What a JOKE! What is HIS ROLE??? How is His ROLE as FATHER played out in the scriptures??? Where in the bible is it stated thus??? Where oh where oh where??? What they have is two gods playing specific roles and a third god is given some sort of ambiguous figurehead title. This is NOT biblical. This is the doctrine of the serpent. And SDA's sadly have swallowed it hook, line, and sinker and are so thoroughly intoxicated with this babylonian wine mixture that they lose all semblance of reason and common sense in their attempt to defend this biblically - which they can't and which it has been graphically shown that they have not!

One challenge that I would put forth to trinitarians and their sympathizers in relation to the issue of the Father would be simply to provide the scriptural testimony that establishes that "one of the divine beings entered into the ROLE of the Father WITHOUT really literally being a FATHER. The burden, again, rests in the laps of the trinitarian to prove their theology that they believe is necessary to assent to in order to be accepted as a true and orthodox christian. Prove it, trinitarians!

Thank you! :)
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
Mickey
pseudo 7th-day Adventist
pseudo 7th-day Adventist


Joined: 27 May 2002
Posts: 144
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 7:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
God the FATHER IS GOD-- in the fullest, completest sense.
How can any finite human spell out the role of the INFINITE HOLY GOD?


Well, you seem to think that any finite human can spell out the ROLE of the second INFINITE HOLY GOD who you believe "entered into the ROLE of the Son"!!! If they are both INFINITE, HOLY GODS, co-equal and co-eternal as you say and you can spell out the ROLE of the one who decided to play-act the ROLE of the Son, why can't you figure out how to spell out the ROLE of the other INFINITE HOLY GOD who decided to "enter into the ROLE of the Father"??? Kind of inconsistent, is it not? But then again, this is characteristic of all heresies. They eat eachother up. They run around chaotically, like little "Pac-Men" just devouring one another!

The more this issue is discussed, the more the fallacy of the trinity is exposed.
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Subtle Misunderstanding All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Page 11 of 13

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group