A Reform-minded Seventh-day Adventist forum
 
In our aim to exalt everything important, first and foremost, we seek to promote a clear understanding of
Daniel, Revelation, the three angels' messages and the alpha and omega of apostasy.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Post Deleted
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Courtroom
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chris Osborne
sentient bipedal physicist
sentient bipedal physicist


Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"None of this is physics as yet"

"I'll leave criticism of your paper to those who have read it"

"It appears that you are making a definition. That's perfectly ok. Next you have to defend any interpretations you may put on that definition. I suspect they have an objection someplace else."

What these professional mathematicians are telling you is that the *MATH* is correct, but the *MATH* that you have chosen is not *REFLECTIVE* of the *PHYSICS* involved.

Dumbass.
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
Eugene Shubert
the new William Miller
the new William Miller


Joined: 06 Apr 2002
Posts: 1073
Location: Richardson Texas

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:05 am    Post subject: Shubert's new, emergent special relativity theory Reply with quote

You obviously don't recognize the contradiction that you're proposing:

Chris Osborne wrote:
"None of this is physics as yet"

… the *MATH* that you have chosen is not *REFLECTIVE* of the *PHYSICS* involved.

Dumbass.

If you are able to refute my interpretation of my purely mathematical definition, then please state your argument in the appropriate thread. Likewise, if you can prove why an explicit function of a real physical quantity has no physical meaning, or embodies in and of itself a false physical interpretation, then I'd like to see that argument also.
Back to top
Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
'); //-->
Chris Osborne
sentient bipedal physicist
sentient bipedal physicist


Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok.
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
DAISY
confused
confused


Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Location: Northern Calif

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

:shock:Here we go again with your NEVERENDING ARGUMENTS brought on by your humility.Okey okey Chris I can never make my sweet lips to Shut up just like you want ,but this very same sweet lips like to kiss you to obey the LORD...Is that hard to do huh?Be an agent of Peace,Eugene did the same sweet treatment to me deleting my post and banishing me to jail..of all the sweetest thing he can do to you I tell ya!At first I got offended,but MY ONE & ONLY TRUE LOVE,my best friend MY SWEET JESUS reminded me to turn the other cheek(I am hoping for a kiss)but what do I get?Anyway,I do not get offended anymore even with my sweet pea when HE reprimands me.My old way of acting out of offensive attacks only gives me headache..but now I have peace in the sea of battles. Laughing
_________________
Wedded to Jesus in Love
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
Chris Osborne
sentient bipedal physicist
sentient bipedal physicist


Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That sounds great Daisy.
Back to top
Send private message  
'); //-->
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Courtroom All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group