I think it's terrible what you have done and you need to untie him immediately. I mean, let's look at this with Ockham's razor. AdminModulous tried to correct me but I proved that he was misinformed about statistical thermodynamics by backing up what I said with unquestionably accurate physics that somehow magically exists in Wikipedia. AdminModulous, who obviously knows a lot of physics, then admits that I have a valid debate topic (two in fact) and requests that I pick one. You then butt in with the pretense that you will withdraw and leave him with your opinion that all I'm doing is "offering inarticulate propositions, and that this is unlikely to change." Now, according to Ockham's razor, you are an obvious liar for pretending that an administrative decision was required immediately and that you didn't know what happened to AdminModulous. You have obviously decided to pull rank and censor both him and me. Your rank hypocrisy proves that even you believe that I probably have a valid point, but you are obviously too bigoted to acknowledge any and all evidence that supports that fact. Consequently, the EvC forum is not an environment for intelligent debate. 
 

I interpret your pretentiously kind offer as a polite request that I either censor myself or be censored anyway. I must say, I am truly flattered by the thought that my legitimate arguments must be suppressed. I am especially delighted by the prospect of receiving other great honors as I take my message elsewhere. I get the hint. Quantum creationism is the most entertaining exploit in the history of physics and that annoys you. If you only knew the fundamentals of probability theory, you would understand that quantum creationism is based on a valid mathematical science and that you can't refute it.

Edited by Shubee, 09-27-2008 12:15 PM.